"What did we do to make them hate us so much?' America
and Western civilization in general are under attack by Islamic terrorists.
Apologists assert that we brought this wrath upon ourselves by our historical
sins (like the Crusades) and therefore we must not only apologize but also make
excuses for terrorism and take blame for their dysfunctional governments
(created by colonialism) and their poverty. So what if our people get berated,
bombed, and beheaded. We had it coming.
Yet such self-hatred fails to recognize that the Crusades
were conducted to take back the Western countries and Christian holy sites that
Muslims had conquered. Colonialism was a problem, but America had no colonies
in Middle East or African colonialism. Dysfunctional governments seem to be the
rule in Muslim countries, but we don't make the rules there. Muslims do.
Moreover, how do sins of the past equate to sins of the
present? The Christian church has gone through many epochs of reform. Radical
Islam does not seek to reform itself. It harkens back to Islam's original and
literal scripture in the seventh century.
***
"So what that we don't have immigration papers? Our
country is poor, yours is rich, and we have a right to violate your laws
because you stole our country and made it poor." Norte Americanos are
blamed for banana republics and the historical government dysfunction in Latin
American. Today, open-border activists argue that the U.S. deserves the chaos
of illegal immigration because of our misbegotten riches, historically stolen
from Latin American countries who now have a right to seize our entitlements
and jobs from our own poor.
Only Mexicans can claim we took part of their country, but
it wasn't originally their country. It had belonged to Spain before Mexico
rebelled against Spanish rule. Texas in 1836 was a province of Mexico, and
Texans seceded because of mistreatment and restricted political rights by the
Mexican government. Mexico refused to grant Texans their freedom and
independence, apparently unwilling to honor the wish of Texans to do the same
thing that Mexico had done to Spain little more than a decade earlier.
California, Arizona, and New Mexico territory were purchased in 1848 from
Mexico with cash and forgiveness of debt owed to Americans.
It is not clear what natural resources we stole from Central
and South America. On the contrary, we created NAFTA trade agreements that help
their economies. We transferred to Venezuela and Mexico the oil technologies
that help to prop up their economies. And the countries that are complaining about
our not taking their emigrants have much stricter immigration restrictions than
we do. Talk about hypocrisy!
***
"Your ancestors were racists and held slaves.
Therefore, we are entitled to affirmative action, reverse discrimination, and
even reparations." The ancestors of most whiteys in America weren't even
here when slavery existed. They were in Europe and Asia and came after the
civil war. And among those who were here, 359,528 Union soldiers died to free the
slaves. Where is the condemnation of the blacks in Africa who captured fellow
blacks and ran the slave trade? American blacks are free to return to Africa —
interesting that they don't want to. Around the world, blacks want to come to
America, not leave it.
***
These and other examples of blaming the victim that could be
cited are political or religious. i these areas, rational and unemotional
discussion is usually futile. So let us consider other examples.
Defense lawyers in general often use "blame the victim"
tactics when they know their defendant is guilty. Soft-hearted juries are
swayed by clever excuses and specious argument. I bet they teach this stuff in
law school.
Among the many examples of blaming the victim are rape
victims whose assailants charge were dressed provocatively and thus were
"asking for it." The excuse is that what a woman wears, says,
where she goes, or what she does can make her responsible for the crime
committed against her. No amount of saying no or physical resistance seems to
nullify the excuses. Lawyers try to gain sympathy for rapists by pointing out
how unfair it is to tempt men. Indeed, this idea is probably the basis for the
Muslim requirements that their women cover their whole body and even their face
when in public.
A related example is domestic violence, typically inflicted
by males on their spouses or girlfriends. The victim is blamed for enabling the
violence by refusing to end the relationship. While resistance to leave can
sometimes develop because the woman is emotionally weak and dependent, often
they have little choice for economic reasons or often justifiable fear for
themselves or children if they dare to leave. A common explanation for why
women do not leave their battering relationship is Seligman's theory of "learned
helplessness." The teaching of helplessness comes from their abuser. In
some locales, the victim faces a high tolerance of wife beating by police and
legal systems.
Chronic victims may be inviting perpetuation of their abuse
when they believe they are victims of outside forces beyond their control. When
helplessness has been learned, it is hard to generate the will and initiative
to use internal psychological resources to overcome the abuse. Chronic victims commonly have low sense of
self-worth, low sense of efficacy, feelings of shame and guilt, and may even
believe that they deserve to be punished. The task of recovery from
victimization is to take responsibility, moving from helplessness to
accountability and from hopelessness to optimism. Seligman makes the point that
optimism can be learned too.
Then there is the death fatwa on Salman Rushdie, whom
former President Jimmy Carter says invited the attempts on his life by writing
a "blasphemous" book. Freedom of speech, according to Carter, seems
to apply only for speech that does not offend. He does not elaborate on where
one draws the line where murder is warranted for verbal offense. Maybe it just
applies to religious challenges.
Bullying is often blamed on the person being bullied for all
manner of reasons, such as being gay, ugly, fat, too smart, in the wrong minority
group, some negative or annoying personality trait, being weak or too
sensitive, and so on. How does the bully justify his own
negative traits? Well, of course, that question never arises because bullies pretend
to feel superior and are condescending.
Whistleblowers and investigative reporters are often blamed
and disparaged when they disclose embarrassing or criminal actions of others.
Their colleagues often shun them. Perhaps shunners feel inferior and shamed by their own lack of courage to do the right thing. If those of
us on the sidelines don't speak up for the true victims, maybe nobody will. Those
who victimize others need to be held responsible, not excused.
Why do people blame the victim? One reason is that people
want to believe that life is fair (it is not), and therefore unfairness is hard
to accept as a cause of victimization. The victim must deserve her state. Another
reason is that making excuses for others provides a rationale for excusing ourselves.
If we can lift the burden of personal responsibility on others, we can justify
doing it for ourselves. Thus, we don't have to face our own weaknesses. Excuse-making is profound cowardice.
Dr. Klemm's latest books are:
Mental
Biology, The New Science of How the Brain and Mind Relate and
Improve
Your Memory For a Healthy Brain. Memory Is the Canary in Your Brain's Coal Mine
Sources:
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Blaming_the_victim
http://bullying.about.com/od/Victims/fl/6-Examples-of-Victim-Blaming.htm
http://www.zurinstitute.com/victimhood.html#dont
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Treaty_of_Guadalupe_Hidalgo
